Part 4. RL Trend: Islamic Imperialism: Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo

General February 5, 2007
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language defines imperialism
as: "The policy of extending a nation's authority by territorial acquisition
or by the establishment of economic and political hegemony over other
nations."

Islam is an imperialistic political system that employs a religious
component for political and imperialistic gain. It is natural therefore that
Islamic reformation and revival should result in renewed zeal for Islamic
imperialism. While Muslims as human beings are extremely varied, holding
beliefs ranging from irreligious to indifference to secular to moderate to
extremist and from liberal to fundamentalist, the agenda of orthodox,
Quranic Islam is absolutely radical and imperialistic.

Islamic imperialism is advanced in myriad ways: through jihad and pro-Sharia
Islamist political movements; economically and culturally through the
Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC), the Arab League, the Islamic
Development Bank (IsDB), and vast oil profits. These profits are used
strategically to disseminate Islamic ideology and advance Islamic politics
and culture, as well as to transform free nations (such as numerous
Christian-majority African nations) and institutions (such as numerous
Western universities) into submissive debtors.

For this annual trends posting I will focus on two regions where Islamic
imperialist zeal and rhetoric rose to dangerous levels through 2006: the
Horn of Africa, and the Balkans.

THE HORN OF AFRICA (HOA)

The year 2006 saw the rise and fall of the Islamic Courts Union (ICU). For
background see WEA RLC News & Analysis postings "Somalia: Igniting jihad in
the Horn of Africa" (28 July 2006) and "Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia: Death
and Danger in the Horn of Africa" (20 Oct 2006).

The rise of the ICU under the leadership of the belligerent al-Qaeda-linked
Sheik Aweys, a vocal proponent of the creation of an Islamic Caliphate over
a Greater Somalia, meant that conflict with neighbouring Ethiopia was
inevitable.

In December 2006 the Ethiopian Army and soldiers loyal to Somalia's
UN-sponsored Transitional Federal Government (TFG) routed and all but
crushed the ICU. It is imperative that Somalia's government receive maximum
international support to secure the state and improve the lives of the
Somali people, thereby securing their hearts and minds.

It is estimated that during the December offensive around 3,000 ICU
militants abandoned their uniforms and diffused back into the civilian
population in Mogadishu where they remain hidden.

Al-Qaeda deputy leader, Ayman al-Zawahri, has called for an Iraq-style
Islamist insurgency. Al-Qaeda will doubtless attempt to incite Islamic
irredentism and imperialism in Somalia, and separatism in Ogaden, the
eastern region of Ethiopia that is home to some four million ethnic Somalis.
This would certainly lead to an escalation in persecution of Christians in
Muslim-dominated regions of the HOA.

Inflamed Islamic imperialist zeal would doubtless also invigorate the
Islamist movement in Khartoum, and this could seriously rattle the tenuous
peace in Southern Sudan. The tensions in the HOA will doubtless also lead to
an escalation in Eritrea (historic enemy of Ethiopia and ally of the
Islamists) of persecution against the Church, including the previously
tolerated Orthodox Church.

The degree to which the wider HOA becomes a theatre for an Islamic
imperialist insurgency (jihad) will depend largely on the commitment and
ability of those charged with keeping the peace in Somalia to persist with
conviction in the long operation of mopping-up terrorists and jihadists as
they emerge.

Several terrorist incidents occurred during January 2007. If Islamic
terrorists and jihadist manage to establish a base of operations for
imperialistic jihad in the HOA, then Western and Christian interests and
assets will be at risk from Addis Ababa to Juba, Djibouti, Asmara, Mogadishu
and Nairobi.

THE BALKANS: SITUATION EXPLOSIVE

While the Balkans remained relatively peaceful through 2006, the issues that
emerged onto centre stage last year are reminiscent of those issues that
were a prelude to war in the 1990s. The two great issues are essentially
related to Islamic imperialism:

* the status of Bosnia's Serbs;

* the status of the Serbian province of Kosovo.

BOSNIA

The situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) was dealt with thoroughly in a
lengthy posting entitled "Bosnia and Herzegovina: Religious tensions rising"
(19 September 2006). That posting included a detailed overview of the
historical context that has given rise to the present position. This is
hugely important because at present the history of the Serb nation, a
Christian nation of Eastern Orthodox tradition, is buried deep beneath a
veritable mountain of lies and revisionist propaganda, myth and demonisation
courtesy of belligerent Islamist imperialist forces and their Western
allies.

That posting was followed up with one entitled "Bosnia and Herzegovina:
Fragile stability threatened by Islamisation" (12 October 2006).

The 1992-1995 Bosnian war was essentially over the status of Bosnian Serbs.
In 1992 the Bosnian Serb rejection of the Islamist Izetbegovic's illegal,
unconstitutional move to declare Bosnia independent from Yugoslavia
triggered war. As Bosnian Muslims (Bosniacs) fought for an independent,
united, Muslim Bosnia, Bosnian Serbs fought to retain their liberty and
autonomy as they had no desire to be reduced to a Christian minority in an
Islamic state, let alone be further separated from their fellow Serbs.

The Dayton Accords of 1995 ended the Bosnian war by establishing an
independent Bosnia divided into two autonomous entities: the Muslim-Croat
Federation, which today is under immense strain, and the Republika Srpksa
(RS, Serb Republic).

Hard-line Islamists have never accepted the Dayton Accords and view it as a
betrayal by their war-time allies, the US. For RS to be part of an
independent Bosnia, yet autonomous and not under Muslim rule, is totally
against the Islamist order. Izetbegovic only signed the Dayton Accords
because he feared that without I-FOR (the international peace keeping force)
on the ground, Serbia and Croatia would attempt to divide Bosnia between
them and that Bosnia alone would not have the capacity to resist.
Izetbegovic knew the Bosniacs needed both the US to keep the peace and Iran
to re-arm and advance the Islamist agenda.

The loudest voice against the "partitioning" of Bosnia and Herzegovina was
war-time Foreign Minister and Prime Minister, Haris Silajdzic. Over the
years Silajdzic has been persistently critical of Izetbegovic for making
what he believed were too many concessions.

On 1 October 2006, Haris Silajdzic was elected as the Muslim representative
in Bosnia's tripartite presidency. Central to his election campaign was his
proposal that RS be dissolved. Silajdzic uses words that impress the West,
such as united, democratic and non-sectarian. But what he is advancing is
the Islamic agenda to put all Bosnian territory and citizens under Muslim
rule.

Further to this, Bosnia is under immense pressure from the West to move from
the "Dayton phase" to the "European phase". Before it can join the EU,
Bosnia is being advised that it must undergo constitutional reforms aimed at
strengthening the central government at the expense of the entities. Some of
these reforms are unacceptable to the Bosnian Serbs as they lessen their
autonomy. The Orthodox Serbs are especially determined to retain autonomy in
the area of policing as they do not want to be under a centrally
administered, Muslim-dominated police force. Islamist imperialists and their
naive supporters then label Serb resistance to dhimmitude as racist and
ultra-nationalist!

The situation in Bosnia is explosive. Serbs (Orthodox) and Croats (Catholic)
are both becoming agitated by the Islamist imperialistic rhetoric that is
rising in an increasingly Islamised Bosnia. The situation today closely
resembles 1992.

KOSOVO

Ever since the Serbs liberated themselves from Ottoman (Islamic) rule
(1912-1913), "Kosovars" (descendents of Albanian Muslims who migrated into
Kosovo during the Ottoman era) have been complaining of "occupation" and
agitating along secessionist lines. And the secessionism is both pan-Islamic
and nationalistic in character.

The contemporary Kosovar vs Serb contest for Kosovo has really been going
for almost a century now. Both sides have attempted to advance their status
by diminishing the "other" when circumstances permitted. The Serb cause
however, was particularly hurt by the Nazi-Muslim alliance in World War Two.

Yugoslavia came under Nazi occupation in April 1941, and while the Croats,
Bosniacs and Kosovars were all allies of the Axis powers, the Serbs were
aligned with the Allies. The Nazis, who viewed the Serbs as a threat to the
Nazi advance in the Balkans, classed the Serbs as a "lesser race" to be
exterminated along with Jews and Roma/Gypsies. Islamic imperialists joined
Muslim Waffen-SS units, such as the mostly Bosniac Handschar Division in
Bosnia and the mostly Kosovar Skenderbeg Division in Kosovo, and massacred
Serbs with impunity.

The Axis powers created a "New" or "Greater Albania" by annexing territory
from Montenegro and Serbia, including Kosovo and the western part of
southern Serbia that is today part of Macedonia. Wide-scale ethnic cleansing
occurred, aimed at creating an ethnically pure Albanian Kosovo, or "Kosova".
The fascist Prime Minister of Greater Albania, Mustafa Kruja, and the Muslim
leader of the Albanian National Committee, Bedri Pejani, both called for the
total extermination of all Orthodox Serb Christians in Kosovo. Pejani also
advocated for the union of Greater Albania with Bosnia and Herzegovina. The
Nazi-allied Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Muhammad Amin al Husseini, approved the
plan as being in the interests of Islam. However the Nazis, recognising that
an Islamic super-state was not in their long-term interests, rejected the
idea and kept the Muslim Bosniacs and Kosovars geographically separated.

Through the WW2 Nazi-Muslim holocaust in Yugoslavia, some one million Serbs,
sixty thousand Jews and eighty thousand Roma were exterminated.

The Islamic imperialist agenda being advanced through the Nazi-Muslim
alliance during WW2 was scuttled when the Allies won the war. However, while
resistance to Nazi occupation came from both the Partisans (Communists, led
by Marshall Tito, a Croat) and the Loyalists (loyal to Yugoslavia's ruling
Serb monarchy), Winston Churchill elected to abandon his Serb allies and
support the Communists for political expediency (peace with the Soviets).
This guaranteed a Communist victory and further suffering for the Serbs.

Marshall Tito divided Yugoslavia along ethnic lines in order to destroy the
hegemony of the Serbs who were the largest ethnic group in Yugoslavia. While
the various ethnic minorities lived in their ethnic regions, Serbs, though
concentrated in Serbia, were scattered over the whole nation. Dividing
Yugoslavia along ethnic lines left millions of Serbs as religious and ethnic
minorities under the rule of those who had attempted genocide against them
in World War Two. Tito also re-cast the borderless regions of Kosovo and
Metohija as a single, bordered province within Serbia. Tito was keen to form
a federation with Communist Albania so he denied the Serbs who had been
ethnically cleansed from Kosovo during WW2 the right to return. In an effort
to appease Kosovar separatists, Tito granted Kosovo autonomy in 1974.

When Kosovo's autonomy was revoked in 1989 on account of rising persecution
of Serbs and sectarian unrest, Kosovar separatism increased, even to the
extent that the Kosovars set up a parallel government. Milosevic dissolved
Kosovo's Kosovar legislature after it unilaterally declared Kosovo
independent. While Albania recognised the "Republic of Kosova" the
international community did not because at that time it still respected
International Law and the UN Charter and would not re-draw international
borders just to appease separatists, Islamic imperialists or terrorists.

Kosovo has been a UN protectorate since 1999. During this time, around 150
historic Serbian monasteries and churches have been destroyed while some 400
mosques have been built. Meanwhile it is estimated that more than 1,000
Serbs and Roma (no Jews, because the KLA drove out all the Jews in 1999)
have been kidnapped, killed and disappeared, while around 230,000 Serbs have
been ethnically cleansed.

On Friday 2 February 2007, UN special envoy Martti Ahtisaari presented his
proposal on the status of Kosovo. Ahtisaari has proposed that Kosovo have
supervised independence.

The Kosovars have accepted the proposal while the Serbs naturally reject
what is essentially a plan to excise 15 percent of Serbia's territory, which
includes its historic spiritual heartland of Metohija
(< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metohija >), and cede it to Kosovar Muslim
separatists.

Ahtisaari's proposal now goes to the UN Security Council where Russia and
China will oppose it while the US and the UK will support it.

The UN cannot declare Kosovo independent without unleashing a torrent of
secessionist claims across the globe and Kosovo, which claims to be special
and unique but isn't, would be the precedent for them all. Russia and China
would both be threatened, which is probably one of several reasons, along
with appeasement of Islamists and attraction to myth, why the US and the UK
are supporting it.

The Serbs are advocating for Kosovo to have autonomy within Serbia (see
<
http://www.kosovocompromise.com/ > ). However Kosovars and other Islamist
imperialists will doubtless accept nothing less than full independence.

The situation in the Balkans is explosive and Kosovo may well prove to be
the fuse.

Elizabeth Kendal
[email protected]

"I also pray that you will understand the incredible greatness of God's
power for us who believe him. This is the same mighty power that raised
Christ from the dead and seated him in the place of honor at God's right
hand in the heavenly realms. Now he is far above any ruler or authority or
power or leader or anything else - not only in this world but also in the
world to come. God has put all things under the authority of Christ and has
made him head over all things for the benefit of the church. And the church
is his body; it is made full and complete by Christ, who fills all things
everywhere with himself." Ephesians 1:19-23 (NLT)

-----------------------------------------
**WEA Religious Liberty News & Analysis**
<
[email protected] >
-----------------------------------------
Please feel free to pass this along to others giving attribution to:
"World Evangelical Alliance - Religious Liberty News & Analysis."

To subscribe for Religious Liberty News & Analysis, please send
your request to <
[email protected].org >.
Please include your name and country or state of residence.

For more information on the World Evangelical Alliance, please see:
<
http://www.WorldEvangelicalAlliance.com >,
For the Religious Liberty Commission of the WEA, see:
<
http://www.WorldEvangelicalAlliance.com/commissions/rlc.htm >.
All WEA RLC material is archived at <
http://www.ea.org.au/rlc >.

PRAYER: For those of you who would like more detailed information on
situations for prayer and intercession, we recommend that you
subscribe to the WEA Religious Liberty Prayer List. Each week a
different nation or situation is highlighted. To subscribe, send an
empty e-mail to <
[email protected] > with any or no subject.

Advocates International <
http://www.advocatesinternational.org >
serves as the legal and judicial advisor to the RLC. Advocates
International links many Christian lawyers and judges around the
world and has been involved in religious liberty issues for many
years.

The Religious Liberty News & Analysis mailing list provides reports
on the state of religious liberty and persecution around the world
with those with a special interest in the field. Most members are
involved in church-based religious liberty advocacy, academic
research, missions leadership, creative-access missions, religious
media, or have prayer networks supporting these groups, although
anyone is welcome to join. Postings average one or two per
week. Information shared does not necessarily reflect the opinion
of World Evangelical Alliance, or of the WEA Religious Liberty
Commission.