Egypt: keeping the Copts subjugated

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on linkedin

By: WEA RLC Principal Researcher and Writer, Elizabeth Kendal

On 11 May, Muslims in the village of Bimha (or Bamha) in Ayat district (around
70 kilometres south Cairo) left their mosques after Friday prayers, armed and
zealous for jihad against the indigenous Coptic Christian community and their
solitary, partially built church.

The violent Muslim pogrom in Bimha bears the same features of other
anti-Christian pogroms of the past decade. These familiar elements indicate
that the security situation for Egypt's indigenous Copts (who are Christian)
is growing increasingly tenuous. For every time violence is rewarded with
impunity it is emboldened.

As with other Muslim pogroms over the past decade, the pogrom in Bimha was
premeditated, organised, very violent and perpetrated not by members of
militant organisations ("extremists" and "outsiders") but by local "ordinary"
Muslims who had been incited in local mosques during Friday "prayers" to wage
jihad and terror against their Christian neighbours in order to ensure their

As with other pogroms over the past decade, Egyptian security forces were at
best tardy, and at worst complicit and actively involved in the violence; and
the imposed settlement was designed to appease Muslims, not secure justice or
true and lasting peace. The "reconciliation" agreement of Bimha disregards the
Christians' legal and human rights, advancing only their status as "dhimmis"
(see: < http://www.dhimmi.com/ > ).

The tragedy in Bimha takes Egypt another step backwards into religious
apartheid as it further reinforces Egypt's indigenous Christian Copts not as
equal citizens, but as a subjugated people – dhimmis. It also presents
Egyptians with yet another precedent which demonstrates that Copts (Egypt's
remnant indigenous peoples, the descendants of the Pharaohs, Christians for
nearly 2000 years) can be terrorised, robbed and killed with impunity.


Despite the fact that the Christians of Bimha had been threatened on the
Thursday and had alerted the police that an attack might be launched after
Friday prayers, security was not tightened. Al-Ahram reports: "Observers have
claimed that tardy responses are typical of the security forces' strategy,
which seems to involve a wait and see approach to sectarian violence, after
which they move in, but only after the violence has abated. Then, they begin
to attempt to clean up the mess." (Link 1)

A report by "Free Copts" paints a more serious picture: "Bamha's Christians
were shocked to discover that electricity, water supplies and phone lines were
cut starting at 11:00 am [Friday morning], in spite of the police officials'
knowledge of the expected riots. The police and security forces only acted
after the burning and destruction of the Christians' properties ended. They
blocked the only bridge that leads to Bamha and established a cordon around
the village, preventing journalists and correspondents from reaching it to
cover the situation. While Muslims are free to dwell across the village, a
curfew has been imposed on the Christians, who are either forced to stay
inside their homes, or to remain on the streets in front of their destroyed
houses." (Link 2: this report includes the names of those Copts hospitalised,
and the names of those Muslims the Copts accuse of being the instigators and
organisers of the violent rampage.)

Al-Ahram is unequivocal about this being a premeditated act: "The sectarian
violence that erupted on Friday in the village of Bimha, in the Ayat district
70 kilometres south of Giza, seemed less a spontaneous outburst fuelled by
wrangling among villagers than a premeditated act. Pamphlets had been
distributed throughout the village before a mob, armed with everything from
machetes to containers of kerosene, ran amok through the village. Within 40
minutes, 36 houses belonging to Christians had been burned and seven shops
looted. Ten villagers were in hospital, two in a critical condition. At the
time of going to press 35 alleged perpetrators were being questioned while
another ten remain at large. A Christian man was subsequently detained,
charged with throwing a plastic bag filled with inflammable liquids into a
Muslim prayer area on Sunday.

"Pamphlets distributed ahead of the violence called on Muslim villagers who
wanted to 'protect' their religion to gather after Friday prayers, in order to
stop the construction of a church in their village. The pamphlet included the
rumoured location of the church and concluded by saying that the time to act
had come: 'there must be no more laxity, no more laziness... it is necessary
that every Muslim protects his religion otherwise all is lost.'"

Al-Ahram spoke with local Copt Raouf Abdallah, who was working in his fields
when he heard women screaming in the village. He ran to his brother's house
but was restrained by two Muslim men while his home was looted and then
torched. "The mob, said Abdallah, comprised all age groups, from the very
young, to elderly men. 'The ghafar [local guards] were also among rioters,
they used their rifles to whip people,' he says. . .He also reports that in
some incidents, Muslims tried to protect the property of their Christian

Free Copts adds: "Copts accuse the village's mayor, as well as the member of
the Egyptian parliament Ali el-Saudi, of promoting these attacks against
Christians and by boasting about preventing Copts from extending and
renovating their church.

"It is noteworthy that Ali el-Saudi was also accused by the Copts of the
Wassef Ghali village to have encouraged the attacks that took place in their
village a year and half ago, and which left many Christians injured."


The Muslim violence against the Christians of Bimha was supposedly in defence
of Islam, which was allegedly under immense and imminent threat on account of
a church – the Church of St Theodore – Bimha's half-built solitary church in
this village of 13 mosques.

Al-Ahram reports: "Bimha's Christian families had long gathered in the home of
fellow congregation members Atif and Arian Youssef in order to worship.
Following negotiations between the [Muslim] clergy and security forces, it was
agreed that a place of worship could be built, though without any domes or
crosses which might anger the local community. After the first floor of the
building was completed in 2005, construction was halted by security officials
after complaints raised by local residents.

"Subsequently a compromise was reached, with Christians allowed to pray in
their old place of worship, the home of Atif and Arian Youssef. To compensate
the two congregation members, whose home would henceforth be a dedicated space
for worship, Atif was to receive money and land, while Arian opted to finish
the church's partially constructed building and make it his home."

According to Al-Ahram, during the Friday 11 May rampage some 2,000 people
converged on the partially constructed building and attempted to demolish it.

According to Free Copts, the security forces have since circulated a
fabricated story, claiming the Copts were attempting to enlarge the church
complex over a disputed piece of land. "The Copts, however, reject this
version of the story, insisting that the land is by no means disputed, and
that it belongs to the church. Furthermore, the Copts of the village of Bamha
accuse the Egyptian police of faking this story in order to cover up the human
rights abuses that took place against the village's Christians."


The most soul-destroying aspect of this saga might be the subsequent
"reconciliation" event held on Wednesday 16 May in the Ayat Sporting Club.
Justice and rule of law were irrelevant and the Copts were pressured, under
the shadow of terror, to submit to unreasonable and unjust terms.

Manar Ammar, writing in Cairo for All Headline News (AHN) reports: "Fifty
Muslim sheikhs from the Ministry of Religious Affairs shook hands and smiled
at 50 Coptic priests Wednesday in Ayat, about 30 minutes south of Cairo. . .
Security forces were heavily present at the session." (Link 3)

AHN reports that a reconciliation committee ordered that the village's Muslim
elders pay compensation to the church. However Coptic leaders, reluctant to
accept any money from Muslims that could be used as leverage against them at a
later date, declined to accept compensation.

Al-Ahram reports:"'Three people from each side sat together and calculated
that the losses incurred by Christian villagers amounted to LE500,000. Then
Father Hanna Makin, the parish priest, announced that the families concerned
would waive their claims as a gesture of good will,' said Ali El-Soudi, Ayat's
representative in the People's Assembly. The delegates also resolved that
Bimha's Christian community should continue to worship in the homes of Atif
and Arian Youssef as happened in the past." (Link 4)

According to Al-Ahram, "The majority of Bimha's Christians say they support
the decision of the church leadership not to accept compensation. 'How can I
accept money from someone who beat me and burned my house? It would be like
being paid for the abuse. At the end of the day we all live together and we
will continue to do so for generations to come.'" (Link 4)

The Copts also had to agree to not press charges against their attackers.
Al-Ahram reports: "'Our Christian brethren have forfeited their complaints in
the spirit of forgiveness, and we will take steps to release 20 detained
Muslims'," said El-Soudi, who also gave assurances that all criminal charges
would be dropped in order to pacify the village further.

As noted by Nabil Abdel-Fattah, deputy director of Al-Ahram's Centre for
Political and Strategic Studies, this is no way to handle sectarian conflict.
"'It [a local "reconciliation" effort whereby disputes are settled by elders
and community leaders in a way that lacks due legal perspective and simply
reflects the balance of power on the ground] effectively prevents the
implementation of the rule of law." Abdel-Fattah insists wrong-doers must be
held legally accountable if others are to be deterred from taking similar
actions. (Link 4)

According to AHN, the Copts accepted the deal because, in the words of
Annabious Jacoub, the high priest of Ayat's Church of the Virgin Mary, ". .
.they are afraid to be called the starters of sectarian tensions."

Photographs taken in the aftermath can be viewed at:


The Catholic News Agency comments on research that clearly demonstrates how
serious and persistent the persecution of Egypt's indigenous Coptic Christians
has been over the last four decades. "The Ibn Khaldoun Research Center [which
is headed by the human rights advocate Saad Eddin Ibrahim] has documented over
120 major attacks on the Copts during this period. Another study estimated
that over 4,000 Copts were killed or injured in this period. They have also
suffered material losses in the tens of millions of dollars." (Link 5)

The primary perpetrators of violence against Copts used to be militants from
Islamic organisations seeking the establishments of an Islamic state. Their
strategy was to use terrorism to extract political concessions from the
government. During the last decade however, the trend has been for attacks to
be incited in the mosques and perpetrated by "ordinary Muslims" who have
become more and more intolerant and hostile as radicalistation and Islamic
zeal have increased. Along with mosque sermons, media and the education
curriculum are also sources of radicalisation and incitement.

"Researchers believe the violence takes place under the influence of hate
propaganda emitted through the media, the education system and mosque
preaching. They report that Egyptian authorities have yet to adequately punish
a single Muslim perpetrator." (Link 5)

"'We ask all freedom-loving governments, Human Rights organizations and
individuals of the world to intervene on behalf of the Coptic Christians of
Egypt,' said the Coptic Christians press statement. 'The reprehensible failure
of Egypt to guarantee religious freedom, justice and accountability towards
the Copts simply amounts to an invitation to continue the same (violence)
against them in the future.'" (Link 6)

And according to Free Copts, Muslims have warned Bimha's Christians that "what
is to come will be much worse".

Elizabeth Kendal
[email protected]


1) Fanning the flames
Al-Ahram. 17 - 23 May 2007. Issue No. 845

2) Another episode of attacks against Copts in Egypt
Written by The Free Copts Saturday, 12 May 2007

3) Muslims, Copts Hold Reconciliation Session Over Sectarian Clashes
By Manar Ammar, Cairo, Egypt (AHN) 19 May 2007

4) Damage limitation
Al-Ahram, 24 - 30 May 2007. Issue No. 846

5) Egypt: Coptic Christians Call for End of Religious Persecution
Catholic Information Service for Africa. 25 May 2007. Cairo

6) Protect Us, Say Egyptians Christians

**WEA Religious Liberty News & Analysis**
<[email protected]>


Please feel free to pass this along to others giving attribution to:
"World Evangelical Alliance - Religious Liberty News & Analysis."

To subscribe for Religious Liberty News & Analysis, please send
your request to < [email protected] >
Please include your name and country or state of residence.

For more information on the World Evangelical Alliance, please see:
< http://www.WorldEvangelicalAlliance.com >,
For the Religious Liberty Commission of the WEA, see:
< http://www.WorldEvangelicalAlliance.com/commissions/rlc.htm >.
All WEA RLC material is archived at < http://www.ea.org.au/rlc >.

PRAYER: For those of you who would like more detailed information on
situations for prayer and intercession, we recommend that you
subscribe to the WEA Religious Liberty Prayer List. Each week a
different nation or situation is highlighted. To subscribe, send an
empty e-mail to < [email protected] > with any or no subject.

Advocates International < http://www.advocatesinternational.org >
serves as the legal and judicial advisor to the RLC. Advocates
International links many Christian lawyers and judges around the
world and has been involved in religious liberty issues for many

The Religious Liberty News & Analysis mailing list provides reports
on the state of religious liberty and persecution around the world
with those with a special interest in the field. Most members are
involved in church-based religious liberty advocacy, academic
research, missions leadership, creative-access missions, religious
media, or have prayer networks supporting these groups, although
anyone is welcome to join. Postings average one or two per
week. Information shared does not necessarily reflect the opinion
of World Evangelical Alliance, or of the WEA Religious Liberty