Hindutva Advances While Communal Violence Bill Flounders


Date: Friday 3 March 2006
Subj: India:Hindutva advances while Communal Violence Bill flounders
To: World Evangelical Alliance Religious Liberty News & Analysis
From: WEA RLC Principal Researcher and Writer, Elizabeth Kendal.


The Shabri Kumbh Mela, held 11-13 February in Dangs, Gujarat, was
established specifically to “consolidate Hindus”, usher tribals into
the “Hindu mainstream”, and deal a “death blow” to Christian
missions in Dangs. The Kumbh was the climax of a massive
Hinduisation campaign that combined the Hinduisation of animism, the
Hinduisation of tribal culture, with an intense anti-Christian
propaganda campaign that included incitement to kill Christians.
(see previous WEA RLC India posting and prayer bulletin, plus
article: link 1)

That the Kumbh ended peacefully, without any bloodshed, is a
testament to the power and mercy of God who intervened for his
people in answer to the prayers of many.

Shabri Kumbh Mela 2006 may be over, but the Sangh Parivar’s (body of
Hindu nationalist organisations) re-energised Hindutva campaign is
only beginning. While protesting the negative press which forced
Gujarat’s State government to provide armed police protection to
Dangi Christians, the Sangh is boasting “great gains” in Dangs. And
the “success” of the Dangs experiment is motivating the Sangh to
replay this strategy in other tribal dominated districts across the

One Hindutva mouthpiece, Organiser, boasts: “Let all the secular
Taliban and left creepers wail and beat their chests but the ongoing
march of the Vanvasi rights and assertion of their cultural
identity shall not be stopped.” (Link 2) A translation of the
double-speak in this sentence could read like this: All those who
support secular politics, real religious liberty, environmentalism,
and the rights of India’s indigenous peoples can complain and
protest all they like, but the Sangh Parivar’s Hindutva campaign to
convince the Adivasis that they are Vanvasi Hindus whose security
and identity is threatened only by Christians shall not be stopped.

As the Sangh’s Hindutva forces advance through the tribal districts
persecution of Christians is increasing in both frequency and
intensity. According to the Sangh, hundreds of tribal Christians are
(with the help of RSS paramilitary forces) seeing the error of their
ways, realising they have been deceived and exploited by the
Christians, and are now “returning home” to Hinduism. Violence
against individual believers, pastors and evangelists, whole
churches, and church and mission property is being reported
constantly, especially in tribal dominated districts and especially
in BJP-ruled states such as Gujarat, Rajasthan, Orissa, Madhya
Pradesh, Chhatisigarh and Jharkhand.

The central government is working to address the issue of communal
conflict. However, the draft Communal Violence (Prevention, Control
and Rehabilitation of Victims) Bill, 2005, is terribly, dangerously
flawed. The Bill increases the power of state governments, but a
Bill that increases the power of governments cannot protect
minorities from government-sponsored terrorism.


The Sangh Parivar is not out to save souls. Its goals are purely
political, rooted in power lust. The primary goal of the Sangh
Parivar is simply to consolidate the Adivasis (indigenous peoples,
called Vanvasi, forest peoples, by the Sangh) as part of the
Hindutva fold before the 2009 federal elections. Religion is simply
a tool with which to achieve social engineering for political gain.

The Sangh wants the BJP returned to power in the centre in 2009,
with a majority so that it can rule outright, without being
compromised by coalition partners. Even if Christians pray for God
to protect every Christian in India from Hindutva violence, the
Sangh can still achieve its political goal if it converts enough
tribals to Hinduism to ensure BJP majority rule from 2009. If that
happens, it could safely be predicted that India’s secular
constitution will be changed, national anti-conversion laws enacted,
and a Hindutva dictatorship established.


Abhishek Kapoor reports for Ahmedabad Newsline: “End of the
three-day Shabari Kumbh here marked the beginning of a new
experiment on mobilising Hindu forces. Led by the RSS, organisations
have planned to use this new tool — more such kumbhs across the
country in a semi-religious setting — to gather Hindus to counter
Christian missionaries and conversions.

“According to plans, these congregations would be different from the
regular Kumbh Melas held at Prayag, Hardwar, Ujjain and Nashik and
focus on reform and social engineering within Hinduism to
consolidate its followers as a single block. The concluding public
meeting, led by Shankaracharya Saraswati of Joshimath, announced
that all tribals including Nagas, Mizos, Santhals, Orans, Bodos,
Mundas and Gonds, belong to Hindu fold.

“The Shankaracharya mooted the idea of more social kumbhs that would
bring Hindus together on one platform. He suggested four new kumbhs
sites in tribal dominated states of Chattisgarh, Jharkhand,
Uttaranchal and the North-East.” (Link 3)

Abhishek Kapoor notes that the aims of the Shabri Kumbh are first
and foremost political: “The religious significance of kumbh could
be termed low as many of the visitors were cadres mobilised by
saffron organisations during the past three months.

“Interestingly, Dangs, like all tribal areas in the State, has been
a traditional Congress bastion with a difference that it stayed with
the party even after the 2002 violence handed all assembly seats to
the BJP.

“However, the BJP remains optimistic about the kumbh’s returns.
Talking to Newsline, a minister in the Modi government said the
party would reap dividends out of the kumbh for next 10 years
without much hard work. ‘Our margins in the Assembly seats of Ahwa
Dangs were as low as 50 and seven votes. With the kind of
mobilisation that has taken place, we do not see much difficulty. If
the kumbh gets institutionalised, it would be an added advantage,’
he said.” (Link 3)


According to the most recent edition of the Organiser, Christians
are “returning” to Hinduism by the hundreds. This is of course, pure
propaganda, presenting the “homecoming” as an act of awakening when
in reality it is a forced conversion made under duress. One cannot
underestimate the confusion, fear and intimidation felt by tribal
Christians when pressured by Hindutva forces to convert or suffer.
The fact is, these believers suffer no matter what they do. If they
are born again believers, their fearful acquiescence will break
their hearts (as Peter’s did: Luke 22:62) and they will need to
rediscover their Lord’s merciful forgiveness and loving acceptance.
If they stand firm, they will be persecuted and their loved ones and
children will suffer with them.

The Organiser reports, “About 335 Christians belonging to 55
families returned to their original roots at a function held at
Soharpat village of Gumla district in Bihar.” The speaker at the
conversion ceremony, Shri Sudarshan Bhagat deman
ded (ironically)
that the state government put a complete ban on conversion.
According to the Organiser: “He said the Christian missionaries had
been trapping local gullible Vanvasis and converting them to
Christianity… He appealed to all people of the community who have
somehow adopted Christianity to come back to their original roots,
[that is, not animism, but Hinduism].”

The Organiser also reports, “In another function held at Bhojpur
village of Etah district in Uttar Pradesh, over 300 Christians
returned to Hindu fold. They also converted the local church into a
temple. The father of the church himself installed the pictures of
goddess Durga, Vaishno Devi and Hanuman in the new temple. After
returning to Hindu fold, he also said the missionaries took unfair
advantage of his poverty and used him for conversion in the area.”
(Link 4)

Speaking at the Shabri Kumbh Mela on 11 February, Hindu teacher
Morari Bapu railed against conversions (to Christianity), and made a
special public appeal to Christian missionaries to follow Christ and
obey the Bible by not converting people to Christianity!

Ahmedabad Newsline reports: “Quoting from a chapter on Luke in the
Bible, Bapu said even Christ’s word forbade conversions… ‘When the
Bible says do not convert, please don’t. It is great that you are
good medicos, and have the money to help poor and ailing. But once
they have been healed, let them go back home (their parent religion)
as good doctors do. Ghar jana koi gunah nahin hai,’ he said, quoting
from a Gujarat Sahitya Prakashan translation of the book.” (Link 5)

Morari Bapu also invited Dangi Christians to convert, or “return” to
Hinduism, saying, “Anybody can make a comeback to his home. Just
have a dip in the holy Pampa Sarovar and worship Shabari Mata, you
will be back home.” (Link 6)

Bapu deliberately manipulates the term “home”, deceitfully
interpreting it as “former religion” rather than home where you
live. According to Bapu’s interpretation, when Jesus healed the
paralysed man and then said, “…take your mat and go home” (Luke
5:24); or when Jesus told the healed demoniac to “Return home…”
(Luke 8:39); he was really telling them to return to their former
religion. Bapu did not address all the other healings where people
were not exhorted to “return home”; he did not address “follow me”.
What he did do though, was sow seeds of doubt, confusion and anger
in the hearts and minds of many down-trodden, illiterate tribals
(including Christians), who may now be tempted to see Christians as
essentially hypocritical and unfaithful to their own religion.


Due to the Sangh’s mobilisation of Hindutva forces and programs,
violence against Christians, particularly in tribal dominated areas,
is escalating in both frequency and intensity. While the Indian
government is making an effort to address this issue, the draft
Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation of
Victims) Bill, 2005, is terribly flawed. The Bill is presently
making its way through public discussion and parliamentary debate.

The fundamental flaw in the bill is that it actually increases the
powers of state governments. Clearly this is totally useless when
sectarian state governments are in collusion with sectarian,
communal organistations. In Gujarat, both the massacre of Muslims in
2002, and the Shabri Kumbh Mela of February 2006, were actively
supported by Gujarat’s BJP state government.

Two critiques of this Bill can be found at Link 7.

They include “A People’s Critique” of the Bill, by ANHAD (Act Now
For Harmony and Democracy), HRLN (Human Rights Law Network) and Jan
Vikas, and published in the Milli Gazette; as well as a report
written by the Executive Director of the Human Rights Law Network
and published in Tehelka.

According to these critiques the core sections of the Bill from
Chapter II to Chapter VI, relating to the prevention of communal
violence, the investigation of communal crimes and the establishment
of special courts will only come into effect if the state government
issues a notification. What’s more, it is not mandatory that the
state government act at all, even if notified by the central
government. Meanwhile, civil society remains powerless to initiate
or control prosecutions when communal crimes occur.

The Bill contains a clause for punishment of public officials who
fail to perform their duties. Yet even here there is both a failing
and a loophole. The Bill fails to hold accountable those in
positions of command and authority such as the Chief Minister.
What’s worse, police who fail to perform their duties, being either
passive or partisan in the face of communal violence, cannot be
charged with an offence unless the state government sanctions the
proceedings. As “A People’s Critique” notes, “In the context of
state governments with communally driven malafide intent, the
chances of even police officials being punished under this clause
are very remote.”

Another flaw in the Bill is the definition of “communal violence”,
which is limited to a list of already criminalised offences, and
does not cover many communal crimes such as mobilisation with
incitement through hate speech, literature, media and teaching. The
Bill also has a very narrow definition of sexual violence which
fails to address issues beyond rape, such as stripping, sexual
slavery and other forms of sexual violence.

As the critics of the Bill note, what is needed is a law which makes
it mandatory for the government to act in clearly codified ways
before, during and after communal violence. And the law needs also
to remove impunity, so that state governments, authority figures,
and police that fail to act to prevent violence may be charged,
tried and punished.

Regarding the power of the central government to intervene (which
obviously is only beneficial if the central government is
non-sectarian), “A People’s Critique” comments: “Section 55 requires
the Central Government, in cases where it is of the opinion that
‘there is an imminent threat to the secular fabric, unity, integrity
or internal security of India which requires that immediate steps’
to ‘draw the attention of the State Government to the prevailing
situation’; and to direct it ‘to take all immediate measures to
suppress’ the violence. If the state government fails to act, the
Bill provides first for the central government to declare any area
within a State as ‘communally disturbed area’ under this Bill; but
this is not significant because, as we observed, such declaration
does not require mandatory actions by the state government to
control the violence. The Bill also provides for central ‘deployment
of armed forces, to prevent and control communal violence’, which
would have been very significant, but the provision is neutralised
by the requirement that this central deployment is legally
permissible only in the event of ‘a request having been received
from the State Government to do so’. In other words, only the state
government still retains the power to decide about the deployment of
armed forces to control communal violence.”

As noted in the report in Tehelka, this proviso, that the central
government must wait for a request from the state government before
it can inter
vene is “a ridiculously retrogressive provision given
the fact that even today the Centre is under no obligation to wait
for consent when the situation goes out of control”.

Elizabeth Kendal
[email protected]


1) India: The dictators of Hindutva aim for ‘death blow’ in Dangs
WEA RLC News & Analysis. 26 Jan 2006

India: Shabri Kumbh Mela Threatens 8000 Christians in Dangs
WEA Religious Liberty Prayer Bulletin – No. 364 – Wed 08 Feb 2006

Apex court acts on anti-Christian video
3 February 2006

2) The grand mingling in the Shabri Kumbh
By Tarun Vijay 26 February 2006

3) RSS wants more such kumbhs
Abhishek Kapoor. 13 February 2006

4) 600 Christians return to Hindu fold

5) From kumbh, Modi sends out a warning to missionaries
Abhishek Kapoor, Sunday , February 12, 2006

6) At RSS meet, Modi, saints oppose Christian missionaries
Ahwa (Gujarat) | February 12, 2006

7) Betrayals and Missed Opportunities: The Communal Violence Bill,
2005. A People’s Critique of the Communal Violence (Prevention,
Control and Rehabilitation of Victims) Bill, 2005. By ANHAD, HRLN &
Jan Vikas The Milli Gazette Online. 8 February 2006

All that hot air

**WEA Religious Liberty News & Analysis**
[email protected]>

Please feel free to pass this along to others giving attribution to:
“World Evangelical Alliance – Religious Liberty News & Analysis.”

To subscribe for Religious Liberty News & Analysis, please send
your request to Elizabeth Kendal <
[email protected]>.
Please include your name and country or state of residence.

For more information on the World Evangelical Alliance, please see:
For the Religious Liberty Commission of the WEA, see:
All WEA RLC material is archived at <

PRAYER: For those of you who would like more detailed information on
situations for prayer and intercession, we recommend that you
subscribe to the WEA Religious Liberty Prayer List. Each week a
different nation or situation is highlighted. To subscribe, send an
empty e-mail to <
[email protected]> with any or no subject.

Advocates International <http://www.advocatesinternational.org>
serves as the legal and judicial advisor to the RLC. Advocates
International links many Christian lawyers and judges around the
world and has been involved in religious liberty issues for many

The Religious Liberty News & Analysis mailing list provides reports
on the state of religious liberty and persecution around the world
with those with a special interest in the field. Most members are
involved in church-based religious liberty advocacy, academic
research, missions leadership, creative-access missions, religious
media, or have prayer networks supporting these groups, although
anyone is welcome to join. Postings average one or two per
week. Information shared does not necessarily reflect the opinion
of World Evangelical Alliance, or of the WEA Religious Liberty