that Hamas has been elected to govern the Palestinian Territories?
Answer: more of the same, and worse.
MORE OF THE SAME…
Hamas’ electoral win is not a surprise result that cannot be 
explained. Hamas will not radicalise Palestinian Muslims. Hamas won 
the elections because the Palestinian Authority has already 
radicalised Muslim society to the extent that it freely elected a 
terrorist organisation as its government. Hamas’ win is the 
culmination of decades of growing discontent – with the economy, 
violence and corruption – coupled with the increased radicalisation 
of Palestinian Muslim society.
Institutionalised discrimination, inequality, and pervasive 
persecution of Christians have been escalating in the Palestinian 
Territories for decades. When the Palestinian Territories came under 
Palestinian Authority (PA) administration after the Oslo Accords, 
security deteriorated and Islamic zeal and radicalisation increased. 
This has made life in the Palestinian Territories increasingly 
difficult for Christians. They live in a state of fear. Those who 
are able, emigrate. For a detailed scholarly description of the 
conditions suffered by Christians in the Palestinian Territories see 
“Human Rights of Christians in Palestinian Society” by Prof. Justus 
Reid Weiner. (Link 1)
…AND WORSE
SECULAR ARAB NATIONALISM IS DEAD – ISLAM RULES
In a 31 January Stratfor Geopolitical Intelligence Report, George 
Friedman comments on Fatah’s loss of power in the recent Palestinian 
National Authority (PNA) elections. “It was not simply internal 
Palestinian politics that drove the Hamas victory. A wave of 
Islamist politics is sweeping the Muslim and Arab worlds, and the 
Palestinians are far from immune. The Islamist movement is doing far 
more than simply challenging the West: It is challenging the secular 
Arabists who were the heirs of the Nasserite tradition… In many 
ways, Fatah was the embodiment of secular Arabism — the purest form 
of Nasserism. The Palestinians were among the most secular in the 
Arab world. Therefore, challenging and defeating Fatah represents a 
critical moment in the history of the Arab and Muslim world. It 
represents a new high-water mark for Islamists.”
Friedman suggests that Hamas will be primarily concerned with 
internal, not international politics, as it works to consolidate its 
position. Hamas will therefore say and do those things that will 
increase the fervor of their followers and discourage their 
opponents. They will look to the Islamic world while provoking the 
West. The West will react to the benefit of Hamas which, as Friedman 
says, “benefits from a sense of embattlement – the sense that it is 
confronting the enemies of Islam. As it backs the Israelis and 
Americans into a corner, and both start reacting, Hamas will 
increase its strength and authority.”
Even before its election victory, Hamas was preparing to further the 
Islamisation of the Palestinian Territories. In December 2005 the 
leader of the Hamas contingent at the municipal council of 
Bethlehem, Hassam El-Masalmeh, told The Wall Street Journal that 
Hamas intends to re-institute the “jizya”, a tax mandated by the 
Qur’an (sura 9:29) to be imposed on non-Muslims who have chosen not 
to convert to Islam and must now pay for their right to life. (Jizya 
is a form of systematic religious humiliation, persecution and 
extortion). (Link 2)
On 3 February 2006, Hamas leader Khaled Mash’al gave a fiery speech 
at a mosque in Damascus that demonstrated clearly Hamas is not 
interested in peace or any dilution of Sharia (Islamic Law). In his 
speech  Mash’al warns that “…the law of Allah cannot be changed or 
replaced”, and  threatens that Hamas is prepared “…to place the 
entire Palestinian people at the disposal of the resistance and its 
weapons”. (Link 3)  We need to ask: what will this mean for 
Palestinian Christians who do not support Islamic jihad?
SO WHAT NOW?
For years, the institutionalised discrimination against and 
persecution of Palestinian Christians has been covered up by 
Christian leaders who are either afraid of the consequences of 
upsetting the status quo, or afraid of losing their good standing 
with the PA; and by Western nations and human rights organisation 
that are only interested in appeasing and coaxing the Palestinian 
Authority into peace negotiations. Well the “status quo” (as 
intolerable as that was) has ended, and peace is not on the table.
Writing prior to the elections, Professor Justus Reid Weiner called 
on the PA to crack down on Hamas and eliminate its influence and 
role as an enforcer of Sharia. It is too late for that now that 
Hamas controls the PA. But as Friedman notes in his Stratfor 
commentary, “Since peace is always made with enemies, better to deal 
with your worst enemy than with hapless moderates.” This is as good 
a time as any to commence advocacy on behalf of the persecuted 
Christians of the Palestinian Territories.
Elizabeth Kendal
[email protected]
Links
1) “Human Rights of Christians in Palestinian Society”
by Prof. Justus Reid Weiner, Jerusalem Centre for Public Affairs.
http://www.jcpa.org/christian-persecution.htm
2) “Democrats” For Jihad and Jizya
by Andrew G. Bostrom. 30 Dec 2005
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5116
3) Hamas Leader Khaled Mash’al at a Damascus Mosque
MEMRI (No 1087). 7 Feb 2006
http://www.memri.org/bin/opener_latest.cgi?ID=SD108706
============================================
**WEA Religious Liberty News & Analysis**
<[email protected]>
============================================
Please feel free to pass this along to others giving attribution to:
“World Evangelical Alliance – Religious Liberty News & Analysis.”
To subscribe for Religious Liberty News & Analysis, please send
your request to Elizabeth Kendal <[email protected]>.
Please include your name and country or state of residence.
For more information on the World Evangelical Alliance, please see:
<http://www.WorldEvangelicalAlliance.com>,
For the Religious Liberty Commission of the WEA, see:
<http://www.WorldEvangelicalAlliance.com/commissions/rlc.htm>.
All WEA RLC material is archived at <http://www.ea.org.au/rlc>.
PRAYER: For those of you who would like more detailed information on
situations for prayer and intercession, we recommend that you
subscribe to the WEA Religious Liberty Prayer List.  Each week a
different nation or situation is highlighted. To subscribe, send an
empty e-mail to <[email protected]> with any or no subject.
Advocates International <http://www.advocatesinternational.org>
serves as the legal and judicial advisor to the RLC.  Advocates
International links many Christian lawyers and judges around the
world and
 has been involved in religious liberty issues for many
years.
The Religious Liberty News & Analysis mailing list provides reports
on the state of religious liberty and persecution around the world
with those with a special interest in the field.  Most members are
involved in church-based religious liberty advocacy, academic
research, missions leadership, creative-access missions, religious
media, or have prayer networks supporting these groups, although
anyone is welcome to join.  Postings average one or two per
week.  Information shared does not necessarily reflect the opinion
of World Evangelical Alliance, or of the WEA Religious Liberty
Commission.




 
								
Stay Connected